Who Represents America?
Paul Craig Roberts
Mail-in voting, along with street corner drop boxes, has proved to be one of the most effective methods of election stealing. There are examples where at the last moment a large number of mail-in votes arrive that suffice to change the outcome.
The Covid lockdown was used to expand mail-in voting. Democrat states such as Connecticut and Delaware made special efforts t o expand mail-in voting. President Trump’s effort to limit mail-in voting to documented citizens is opposed by “voting rights groups,” which are mainly Democrats such as the League of Women Voters, by some election officials who claim mail-in voting increases election integrity, and by the US Supreme Court.
The claim is made by Democrats that mail-in ballots are only sent to registered voters. But we know that lists of registered voters are seldom brought up to date and that states and voting rights groups resist purging the rolls of dead people and people who have moved out of state. We have examples of people being voted in states that they no longer live in. James O’Keefe and others have presented evidence of vote and election fraud due to unverified mail-in ballots. It seems to be clear that whichever party that controls the elections in a state has a reserve of ballots that can be mailed in at the last minute to change the winner. There are examples where the last minute mail-ins are almost all for the Democrat candidate, although it does seem that the Zionist Republicans used this fraud against Israel critic US Rep. Thomas Massie in his recent primary.
Consider the League of Women Voters of Massachusetts’ case against Trump’s effort to ensure that the mail-in ballots actually come from US citizens residing in the states. Trump’s executive order requires the Department of Homeland Security to compile from various federal data bases, including Social Security, a list of US citizens for the US Postal Service with the requirement that the mail-in ballots can only be delivered to those on the voting list. The League of Women Voters argued that the federal data bases are out-of-date and unreliable. But so are the states lists of registered voters. The League of Women Voters does seem to be more concerned about preventing unqualified voting than with election integrity.
The League of Women Voters also argues that President Trump’s effort to restore integrity to US elections is an attempt to seize control of elections from Congress and the states. The League of Women Voters says no constitutional text allows actions by the President to protect election integrity. This is a curious way of putting it if the Constitution actually prohibits Trump from establishing election rules in the interest of election integrity. What exactly is the case that the President cannot act in the interest of election integrity, which requires that only citizens can vote?
The two justices on the Court who have the most integrity and who are the most principled, Thomas and Alito, saw the issue differently from the majority. Justice Alito pointed out that the issue on which the majority ruled against Trump’s executive order was that there was insufficient time to implement Trump’s order before the upcoming midterm federal elections and therefore the order would be disruptive of the election. In other words, the scheduling crunch was cleverly timed by those challenging Trump’s order.
Now, think about this for a moment. If Trump and the Republicans stood to gain from mail-in voting, why would they oppose it?
Unless Democrats stand to gain from mail-in voting, why their enormous efforts to prevent President Trump from increasing the integrity of US elections?
Republicans claim that the Democrat political machine in Chicago elected John F. Kennedy president by stealing the election from Richard Nixon. I do not know if this is true. I do know that the Democrats stole the 2020 election from Trump with successful vote fraud in the swing states. The fraud is obvious despite its almost universal media denial. In the five swing states that flipped to Democrat, the states’ election procedures were controlled by Democrats. No Democrat state was flipped to Republican.
I do know that Republicans are more conservative and patriotic than Democrats. It is Republicans, not Democrats, who chant “USA, USA.” It is Democrats who favor voting by illegal aliens and who appoint them police officers and local government officials and act to prevent their deportation. It is obvious that Democrats favor multiculturalism over Americanism as evidenced by Minneapolis broadcasting over public loudspeakers the Muslim call to prayer six times a day. Anything a Democrat can do to stick her finger into America’s eye will be done.
Patriotic Americans, a body of people that I think excludes most Democrats, face a dilemma in the upcoming fall elections. Trump and the Republicans stand for Israel against America’s interest and at Americans’ cost. But the Democrats stand against America. The Democrats favor immigrant-invaders and have opposed all efforts to protect America’s borders and the meaning of US citizenship. The Democrats are the party of multiculturalism that is turning America into a Tower of Babel in which there is no longer a gender difference between male and female. All the weird stuff that infect our society has its home in the Democrat Party.
I attribute Trump’s failure to renew America to Netanyahu and the all powerful Israel Lobby. Trump allowed his commitment to Israel to prevail over his commitment to his MAGA supporters. Instead of being the man of peace as he promised in his campaign, he became the puppet and co-conspirator in Israel’s war for Greater Israel. There was no reason other than Israel’s request for the US to join Israel’s disastrous attack on Iran, the consequences of which threaten Trump’s presidency. Trump’s claim of “Iranian nukes” is the lie Trump uses for his intervention on the side of Israel’s war for Greater Israel. Reed Rubinstein, legal adviser to the Secretary of State wrote in the official State Department document that explains Washington’s attack on Iran that “the United States is engaged in this conflict at the request of and in the collective self-defense of its Israeli ally, as well as in the exercise of the United States’ own inherent right of self-defense.” https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-legal-adviser/2026/04/operation-epic-fury-and-international-law Rubinstein’s assertion of American self-defense is problematical. It was not Iran that attacked the US and Israel. It was Washington that in concert with Israel that initiated the conflict by aggressively attacking Iran. Naked aggression is not self-defense. Self-defense is what Iran is doing.
Trump allowed and even financed with money, weapons, and diplomatic protection Israel’s genocide of Palestine, now reinforced with Trump’s transfer of 40,000 tones of bombs at US taxpayers’ expense to Israel for use against Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran. https://paulcraigroberts.org/having-trump-in-the-white-house-is-the-same-as-having-netanyahu-in-the-white-house/
Trump was led with a ring through his nose by Netanyahu on a fool’s errand that Iran would collapse in 3 days from an Israeli American attack. The result was the destruction of Washington’s military power in the Middle East. To save victory from defeat, the White House has discussed nuking Iran, a country with whom America has no legitimate beef. Washington is acting solely as Israel’s agent.
We are left staring at the paradox that citizens of America, allegedly the example for the world of democracy in action, are totally devoid of political representation Neither of America’s political parties represents Americans.
How then is America a democracy?