The true story is that Renee Good attempted to murder ICE officer Jonathan Ross
Bongino Report
DHS SHATTERS DEMOCRAT NARRATIVE
Another Democrat narrative completely debunked.
The ICE agent who fatally shot Renee Nicole Good suffered serious injuries, including internal bleeding in his torso after Good accelerated her SUV into him, the DHS confirmed on Wednesday.
Those facts completely contradict Democrats’ narrative that the ICE agent was neither struck nor injured. For example, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey claimed the agent “walked away” with only a “hip injury.”
In reality, the brave officer was hospitalized and is now recovering from his injuries.
Unfortunately, the agent is currently “in hiding,” Border Czar Tom Homan said, because of leftist threats to his safety.
Human Events
ICE officer Jonathan Ross suffered internal injuries from being struck by the vehicle, driven by Renée good:
1. Minneapolis ICE Investigation and Legal Exposure
Federal prosecutors opened a criminal investigation following the January 7, 2026 incident in Minneapolis, Minnesota in which ICE officer Jonathan Ross was struck by a vehicle driven by Renee Good during a federal immigration enforcement operation. Investigators are reviewing video evidence, witness statements, and on-scene conduct to assess obstruction, incitement, conspiracy, and other potential federal criminal exposure connected to the assault on Ross.
Authorities discussed potential violations including obstruction of federal officers, intimidation, aiding and abetting, and urging flight from lawful detention. Statements and recorded footage referenced encouragement and coordinated actions during the encounter. Prosecutors indicated liability may extend beyond the individual operating the vehicle.
Ross, a 19-year Department of Homeland Security veteran and Iraq War veteran, later suffered confirmed internal bleeding and internal injuries. Officials stated this was the second time Ross had been injured by a vehicle while on duty. The injuries were described as serious and directly caused by the impact.
Federal officials reported a sharp increase in vehicle-ramming incidents targeting ICE and Border Patrol officers following the Minneapolis event. The case was framed as part of a broader pattern of escalating violence against federal law enforcement. Authorities emphasized that state or local political opposition does not negate federal criminal statutes.
US Supreme Court questions the liberal-left argument that the Civil Rights Act gives men who self-declare themselves to be women the right to take over female sports:
Supreme Court Case on Women’s Sports and Sex-Based Law
The United States Supreme Court heard arguments on whether biological males may compete in women’s sports under Title IX. The discussion centered on whether sex-based protections are rooted in biological sex or gender identity. Justices questioned whether sex can be legally defined without reference to biology.
Arguments addressed state policies allowing athletes to compete based on gender identity rather than biological sex. Concerns raised included competitive fairness, physical safety, and privacy in locker rooms and athletic facilities. The Court examined whether such policies undermine the original intent of Title IX.
Advocates emphasized documented performance differences between male and female athletes. Arguments stated that women’s sports could be fundamentally altered or displaced without sex-based categories. Opposing views focused on inclusion and nondiscrimination frameworks.
The pending decision is expected to have nationwide implications for school athletics and education policy. Observers noted the ruling could clarify how sex is defined in federal civil rights law. The case was described as a defining moment for women’s athletic protections.