All of the surprise crises such as 9/11 and Covid pandemic had previous or simultaneous simulations
It seems that what was planned was simulated in order to have an idea how to proceed with the deception
Comment by PCR: In the article below, Soren Korsgaard presents evidence that COVID-19 had spread in several countries prior to its discovery in Wuhan, China. This raises the question whether COVID, a man-made virus, was intentionally released in order to create a pandemic that could be used as a precedent for the imposition of societal controls and coerced mass vaccination.
US Senators Ron Johnson and Rand Paul have been trying to bring a real investigation, but their efforts are being strongly resisted by Big Pharma and the 70% of medical research financed by the pharmaceutical industry, by the media heavily dependent on pharmaceutical advertising, and by government officials complicit in the deception. Members of Congress also have their eye on Big Pharma’s financial contributions to their reelection campaigns. I conclude the official–and false–COVID narrative will be difficult to replace with actual facts. But a few honest men are trying. Give them your support in order to avoid being a next time victim.
All of the surprise crises such as 9/11 and Covid pandemic had previous or simultaneous simulations
Søren Roest Korsgaard
In response to my latest article, “There was no Lab Leak: COVID-19 was Spread Intentionally on Multiple Continents,” a reader interestingly emailed me asking if I had uncovered any “bizarre” exercises or drills “associated” with the COVID-19 pandemic. Well, yes, more than a few.
Astute researchers have long observed that major, defining catastrophes tend to be accompanied by mysterious exercises or drills that parallel the real-world events. One of the most conspicuous examples is the terrorist attacks of 9/11. The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) inexplicably failed to protect American skies on 9/11, yet it had mysteriously simulated “hijacked airliners” being used as “weapons to crash into targets and cause mass casualties” [1]. One of the targets was the World Trade Center. Nevertheless, the Bush administration asserted that the attacks were “unimaginable” [1].
Government agencies also rehearsed scenarios with strong parallels to the actual attack on the Pentagon. One of the exercises, called “The Pentagon Mass Casualty Exercise,” took place in October 2000 [2]. The Daily Mirror later obtained an overview of the exercise—a passenger plane crashing into the Pentagon courtyard, killing 341 people—and reported that it “reads like an account of what actually happened” on 9/11 [ 3]. Later, in May 2001, a Department of Defense exercise simulated that a “hijacked 757 airliner crashed into the Pentagon” [4]. Just a few months later, on September 11, 2001, a hijacked 757 airliner—Flight 77—crashed into it. Participants reported that the exercise had “helped tremendously” in responding to the actual attack and had saved lives [5-6].
When writing about drills matching real-world events, one cannot avoid the now largely forgotten attacks of July 7, 2005—known collectively as 7/7. The official investigation concluded that terrorists carried out a series of four coordinated suicide bombings on three London Underground trains and a double-decker bus in Tavistock Square. While 7/7 was framed as a surprise attack, the Metropolitan Police Service’s Anti-Terrorist Branch had in fact simulated—just five days earlier—simultaneous bombs detonating on three London Underground trains [7-8]. Moreover, within hours of the actual attacks, Peter Power, an expert on terrorism and crisis management, told BBC Radio 5 Live:
At half past nine this morning, we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning [9].
The BBC presenter couldn’t believe it and interrupted Power: “To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this, and it happened while you were running the exercise?” [9]. Power replied in the affirmative: “Precisely,” adding that “within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one,” and “so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking, and so on” [9].
When seven Islamic terrorists killed 130 people and injured hundreds more in Paris in 2015, the city’s emergency services, known as SAMU, had just hours earlier “trained” for a “scenario involving multiple shootings” [10]. Dr. Pierre Carli, the head physician of the Paris SAMU, admitted that it was “barely believable” but they had “carried out a kind of dress rehearsal,” which made them “particularly well-prepared” for the actual attacks [10]. The exercise, which had been scheduled nearly three months in advance, simulated groups of terrorists simultaneously opening fire on 13 different sites, killing 50 people and injuring many more [11].
Having illustrated the synchronicity with a few among many examples, let’s switch focus to COVID-19. The first known exercise was organized by the Wuhan Customs and the Executive Committee of Military World Games. On September 18, 2019, the organizers held an emergency response drill at the Tianhe International Airport, simulating an arriving passenger infected with a “novel coronavirus” [12-13]. The drill tested the full process of handling a contagious traveler from epidemiological investigation and medical screening to setting up temporary quarantine areas and transferring the case for treatment. Not much else is known, but it is an interesting coincidence. Did Chinese officials know something we didn’t?
Exactly one month later, the well-known Event 201 was held—a tabletop exercise organized by the World Economic Forum, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Dr. Michael Ryan, the Executive Director of the WHO’s Health Emergencies Programme, introduced the exercise to a select group of key decision-makers from public health, the private sector, and government. “This is the new normal,” he began, “I fully expect that we will be confronted by a fast-moving, highly lethal pandemic” [14].
Over the course of three and a half hours, the participants discussed a series of dramatic scenarios, pre-recorded news broadcasts, and live “staff” briefings about a highly transmissible novel coronavirus, which became an uncontrollable global pandemic after an initial outbreak from bats to pigs and then to humans in Brazil. The virus gave rise to a respiratory disease—Coronavirus Acute Pulmonary Syndrome, or CAPS for short—with symptoms ranging from mild flu-like symptoms to severe pneumonia [15].
After ravaging the world for 18 months, CAPS had incurred a death toll of 65 million, while the travel sector took a huge hit and the global economy spiraled into a deep recession. No vaccine could be made available in the first year, yet a simulated poll showed that a large majority would be willing to take a fast-tracked “experimental vaccine” [15].
Afterwards, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation warned that it was “only a matter of time” before humanity would be facing a “severe pandemic, which becomes ‘Event 201’” [16]. To address gaps in pandemic preparedness, they outlined seven recommendations covering economics, logistics, medical manufacturing, and combatting misinformation. As for the latter, they suggested fostering strong relationships between governments and social media companies, flooding the information ecosystem with fast and “accurate” messages from public health agencies, and using technology to suppress “false” information [17]. Governments adopted most of the recommendations during the pandemic.
While Event 201 received considerable attention, it is less known that the extraordinarily fast development of Moderna’s COVID vaccine came about as the result of an exercise, named the “stopwatch drill.” Peter Loftus, a journalist for The Wall Street Journal, received word of the drill while researching his book about the development of the vaccine [18]. After conducting nearly 300 interviews with over 150 key officials, Loftus established the following timeline.
On January 6, 2020, Moderna’s CEO, Stéphane Bancel, was on vacation in France. While flipping through The Wall Street Journal, he came across an article that alerted him to a “mystery virus outbreak” in Wuhan that had caused a cluster of pneumonia cases [19]. Concerned, he immediately contacted Dr. Barney Graham, the Deputy Director of the Vaccine Research Center (VRC) at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). He had previously worked with Graham on a vaccine for the Zika virus, but the effort lost urgency as the virus waned. The NIAID-Moderna collaboration continued, however, because Fauci “saw promise” in the mRNA technology on which Moderna was betting [19].
A few weeks earlier, Graham and Dr. John Mascola, the Director of the VRC, had toured Moderna’s new manufacturing plant. In an interview with Loftus, Mascola recalled that Moderna officials had boasted that “they could make a small batch of a new vaccine within sixty days of the medicine’s design” [19]. Apparently intrigued by this claim, Moderna and NIAID officials, with Fauci’s involvement, decided to pick a virus and design a vaccine as part of a “stopwatch drill” aimed at pandemic preparedness [19]. Moderna would then produce a batch of the vaccine and deliver it to the NIAID, which would conduct a clinical trial.
At first, NIAID decided to use the Nipah virus as the focus of the stopwatch drill, but after learning of the Wuhan outbreak, Bancel and Graham switched focus to the real-world threat. Dr. Mascola later explained, “It was really because we were thinking about pandemic preparedness prior to COVID” [19]. Bancel himself was “convinced that the virus was going to spread widely and that Moderna should go all in on the stopwatch test” [19]. And they did.
On January 7, Bancel, still in France, asked Graham if he and his colleagues had obtained the genetic sequence of the virus. Graham replied that they were working on it. He surmised that it was a SARS-like coronavirus, but this was apparently not a problem: “We know what to do and have proven that mRNA is effective,” and added that it would be a “great time to run the drill” to see how quickly they could have a scalable vaccine. Bancel replied, “Let us know in real time. I will get the team aware of it and ready to run when you give us a sequence” [19]. The drill positioned NIAID and Moderna to be ready to develop a vaccine against COVID-19 as soon as the genome was published. This took place on January 11 (Boston time). Moderna and NIAID immediately began modifying it, and within 48 hours they had “landed on what they felt was the best sequence of the spike protein” [19].
Subsequent to the unprecedented rapid development of the vaccine, Bancel and Moderna began seeking funding. On January 20, he sent an email to Dr. Richard Hatchett, the Director of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), asking if his organization would be willing to provide funding. Seven minutes later, Hatchett replied, “Short answer is I think so. Our team was talking to Barney today and he had proposed we cover the Phase 1 manufacturing” [19]. Shortly after, Bancel and Hatchett met at the annual World Economic Forum conference in Davos, Switzerland. Here, Bancel’s financial worries were put to rest when Hatchett agreed to provide about $1 million to produce a batch for testing.
Moderna’s officials quickly put CEPI’s capital injection to work. By the end of January, they had produced 12 vials and quickly shipped them to the NIAID for testing in mice. By February 7, they had produced 500 more for human testing. On February 24, they issued a press release proudly announcing that they had shipped the first batch to the NIAID for an upcoming Phase I clinical trial [20].
Thus, as we have seen, like other defining events, COVID-19 is surrounded by exercises that seem to have played a role in the actual events. Of course, the significance of these exercises remains undetermined because we have yet to see an investigation into the COVID-19 pandemic without predetermined conclusions. My book, The New September 11th: Solving the COVID-19 Pandemic, is a serious attempt to get to the truth about the vaccines, lockdowns, the origin of the virus, and everything in between.
References
[1]. “NORAD had drills of jets as weapons.” Steven Komarow and Tom Squitieri, USA TODAY (April 19, 2004). Original page archived here https://911research.wtc7.net/cache/wtc/info/usatoday_040418noradx.htm [accessed June 2026].
[2]. Contingency planning Pentagon MASCAL exercise simulates scenarios in preparing for emergencies https://web.archive.org/web/20060203154028/https://www.mdw.army.mil/content/anmviewer.asp?a=290 [accessed June 2026].
[3]. Pentagon Chiefs Planned For Jet Attack https://web.archive.org/web/20021020022517/http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=11897568&method=full&siteid=50143 [accessed June 2026].
[4]. Crisis Response Puts Agencies On Path To Better Coordination https://web.archive.org/web/20030704044348/https://www.usmedicine.com/article.cfm?articleID=329&issueID=34 [accessed June 2026].
[5]. Pentagon Medics Trained For Strike https://web.archive.org/web/20020427135215/http://www.usmedicine.com/article.cfm?articleID=272&issueID=31 [accessed June 2026].
[6]. Fortuitous Mass-Casualty Training at Pentagon Saved Lives 10 Years Ago https://www.usmedicine.com/agencies/department-of-defense-dod/air-force/fortuitous-mass-casualty-training-at-pentagon-saved-lives-10-years-ago [accessed June 2026].
[7]. 7/7 bombings: Why we can never stop tackling extremism https://web.archive.org/web/20240809070905/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/11719684/77-anniversary-Why-we-can-never-stop-tackling-extremism.html [accessed June 2026].
[8]. Could 7/7 Have Been Prevented? https://isc.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/20090519_ISC_7-7_Review.pdf [accessed June 2026].
[9]. BBC Radio – Drills Ran on day of London bombings 7-7-05 https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/sEbUQiYOGjU [accessed June 2026].
[10]. Attentats : le Samu avait “organisé une répétition générale vendredi matin” https://www.franceinfo.fr/faits-divers/terrorisme/attaques-du-13-novembre-a-paris/attentats-de-paris-le-samu-avait-organise-une-repetition-generale-vendredi-matin_1177061.html [accessed June 2026].
[11]. Vendredi 13 Novembre, 9H12, Simulation Terro-Riste Au Samu De Paris https://www.revmed.ch/revue-medicale-suisse/2015/revue-medicale-suisse-497/vendredi-13-novembre-9h12-simulation-terro-riste-au-samu-de-paris [accessed June 2026].
[12]. 军运会航空口岸专用通道开通测试 https://web.archive.org/web/20200220052649/http://m.xinhuanet.com/hb/2019-09/26/c_1125040756.htm [accessed June 2026].
[13]. Xinhua: On Sep 18, 2019, Wuhan Held an Emergency Response Drill for Novel Coronavirus https://chinascope.org/archives/21681 [accessed June 2026].
[14]. Event 201 Pandemic Exercise: Segment 1, Intro and Medical Countermeasures (MCM) Discussion https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vm1-DnxRiPM [accessed June 2026].
[15]. Event 201 Pandemic Exercise: Highlights Reel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoLw-Q8X174 [accessed June 2026].
[16]. Event 201 https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/ [accessed June 2026].
[17]. Public-private cooperation for pandemic preparedness and response https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/recommendations.html [accessed June 2026].
[18]. Peter Loftus. The Messenger: Moderna, the Vaccine, and the Business Gamble That Changed the World. (Harvard Business Review Press, 2022).
[19]. Health Officials Work to Solve China’s Mystery Virus Outbreak https://web.archive.org/web/20200113045802/https://www.wsj.com/articles/health-officials-work-to-solve-chinas-mystery-virus-outbreak-11578308757 [accessed June 2026].
[20]. Moderna Ships mRNA Vaccine Against Novel Coronavirus (mRNA-1273) for Phase 1 Study https://investors.modernatx.com/news/news-details/2020/Moderna-Ships-mRNA-Vaccine-Against-Novel-Coronavirus-mRNA-1273-for-Phase-1-Study/default.aspx [accessed June 2026].