The View of Russia in the West
Paul Craig Roberts
The upcoming Trump/Putin summit is hampered by the crazed portrait of Russia painted by presstitutes. Jonathan Chait, Amy Knight, Max Bergmann, Yaroslav Trofimov, Roger Cohen, and the rest of the conscious or de facto CIA assets that comprise the Western presstitute media have turned Putin into a superhuman who controls election outcomes throughout the West, murders people without rhyme or reason, and has President Trump under his thumb doing Putinâs bidding. Who could imagine a more extreme conspiracy theory?
Jonathan Chait in New York magazine writes that âthe dark crevices of the Russia scandal run deep,â so deep that âit would be dangerous not to consider the possibility that the summit is less a negotiation between two heads of state than a meeting between a Russian-intelligence asset and his handler.â http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/07/trump-putin-russia-collusion.html
So here is Chait, who brands truth-tellers âconspiracy theoristsâ coming up with the greatest conspiracy theory of our time that President Trump has been a Kremlim asset since 1987. Chait provides a âcrazy quilt of connectionsâ to illustrate his absurd conspiracy theory that âitâs not necessary to believe that Putin always knew he might install Trump in the Oval Office to find the following situation highly plausible: Sometime in 2015, the Russian president recognized that he had, in one of his unknown number of intelligence files, an inroad into American presidential politics.â
Chait believes that Russia is also behind the UKâs exit from the European Union. âDriving Britain out of the European Union advanced the decades-long Russian goal of splitting Western nations apart, and Russia found willing allies on the British far right.â
Chait gets even more conspiratorial. He admits that Paul Manafortâs indictments for alleged white collar crimes are not related to Trumpâs election, having occurred years previously in Ukraine. Nevertheless, Chait is certain that Manafort is shielding Trump even though according to Chait Manafort is facing many years in prison. Why would Manafort shield Trump? Chaitâs answer:
âOne way to make sense of his behavior is the possibility that Manafort is keeping his mouth shut because heâs afraid of being killed. That speculation might sound hyperbolic, but there is plenty of evidence to support it. In February, a video appeared on YouTube showing Manafortâs patron Deripaska on his yacht with a Belarusian escort named Anastasia Vashukevich.â
Chaitâs article is long and heavily weighted with innuendo. Chait, or whoever wrote the article, possibly the person who wrote the Steele Dossier, collects every disparaging fact and fantasy about Trump and assembles them in a way to paint a portrait of a person who must also, without much doubt, be a Russian agent. If the public can be convinced of this, the military/security complex can assassinate Trump and blame Putin for getting rid of an asset who was exposed by the Russiagate investigation, no longer useful, and perhaps prepared to spill the beans.
Another conspiracy theorist, Amy Knight, writes that âThe real question is where does the Russian criminal state end and the criminal underworld begin, and how do they work together in what amounts to a new murder incorporated?â https://www.thedailybeast.com/novichok-victim-dies-did-the-kremlin-really-lose-control-of-its-deadliest-poisons?ref=wrap
Yaroslav Trofimov tells us in the Wall Street Journal (July 7) that âPutin maps out his own empireâ to replace the lost Soviet one.
In the Washington Post Max Bergmann tells us that Trump is going to sell out NATO in Helsinki. This line leads to the supposition that Putin is using Trump to unleash the Russian military on Europe. Many conspiracy theorists have come together on the view that first the Baltic States will be invaded and then Putin will move on to Germany and the rest of Europe. The New York Timesâ Roger Cohen even pulls Marine Le Pen into the plot which widens to include ethnically cleansing the West of the refugees from Washingtonâs wars.
This is the level of absurdity that the American media delivers to the publicâs understanding of foreign affairs.